Screening six applications
Let the application drive the specs, not a star model. This is a sales-level screen and never replaces an engineer's sign-off. The sequence: how heavy → how fast → how precise → how harsh → people nearby? → who integrates.
Six screening questions
Go in order; if any step lacks information, go back and ask rather than jumping to a model.
- How heavy? (payload)Tool + part + margin; ask about the offset and the furthest pose.What's the combined mass of the EOAT and the part, and where is the center of gravity?
- How fast? (cycle time)Does the target include mould open/close and conveyor time? Cobots have a speed ceiling; don't force them onto high-speed lines.What is the target cycle time, and what does it include?
- How precise? (accuracy)Most lines start with repeatability; ask about absolute accuracy for offline programming or no vision.What positioning tolerance do you need at the part?
- How harsh? (environment)Oil, dust, temperature, cleanliness, explosion risk directly decide the IP rating and protective covers.Any coolant, dust, washdown, cleanroom or explosion-proof requirements?
- People nearby? (HRC)Shared workspace or fenced? Who issues the safety standards and certification?Will operators share the workspace with the robot?
- Who integrates?Us, a customer-chosen SI, or the customer's own team; this sets the quote package and the risk.Who will handle integration: us, your SI, or your in-house team?
Application comparison
| Application | Priority specs | Typical set-up | Commercial watch-out |
|---|---|---|---|
| Machine / injection-moulding tending | Cycle time, reach, IP (oil, release agent) | Six-axis or cobot + dual gripper; add vision if complex | Confirm machine signals and door control early |
| Arc / spot welding | Path accuracy, welder compatibility, cable management | Welding robot + power source + positioner + torch cleaner | State who owns the weld process window; welding is often delivered by an SI |
| Grinding / polishing | Force control, dust protection, stiffness | Six-axis + force control + spindle + dust extraction | Surface quality is hard to quantify; agree reference samples for acceptance |
| Precision assembly | Repeatability, force control, vision | SCARA or cobot + vision / force control | Incoming-part consistency is a hidden risk; trial-assemble samples |
| Palletising | Payload, cycle time, stack height | 4-axis palletiser or six-axis / cobot + vacuum or clamp | Carton strength and film wrap decide the vacuum design; agree the number of SKUs |
| Logistics / inspection | Navigation, docking accuracy, battery life, load | AGV / AMR or mobile manipulator | Floor, Wi-Fi, lifts and access control need customer support |
Five more applications: what should sales look for?
| Application | Site facts | Often missed | Next validation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arc welding | Seam location, part tolerance, torch approach | Reachability does not guarantee weld quality | Weld samples and agree quality criteria |
| Grinding / polishing | Material, stock removal, surface finish | Abrasive life, dust and part variation | Test force window, consumables and extraction |
| Precision assembly | Fit clearance, incoming variation, insertion force | Repeatability alone misses tolerance stack-up | Trial multiple batches and measure yield |
| Palletising | Carton size, weight, stack pattern and layers | SKU changes, pallet offset, carton deformation | Test the heaviest and softest package for grip and cycle |
| AMR logistics | Routes, floors, doors, lifts, Wi-Fi | A mapped route does not prove fleet traffic works | Walk the site; test peak traffic and fault recovery |
Across these applications, the customer describes what they want to buy; sales asks how the site runs and how success will be accepted. End screening with a verifiable next step: samples, a site survey, simulation inputs or a process review.
Case: an injection-moulding tending project from start to finish
This is an illustrative example based on common industry situations, used to tie together the earlier chapters.
Week 1 · Inquiry. A Chinese-owned injection-moulding plant in Vietnam emails: “We need robots for 6 injection machines, cycle about 30 s.” Instead of rushing a quote, the salesperson replies with a short question list: part weight and size, mould opening direction, whether gates must be cut, where finished parts go, site voltage, and whether an integrator is already involved.
Weeks 2–3 · Discovery. After the reply, the salesperson sets up a video call and asks the customer to film the shop floor on a phone. The machines are 450-tonne horizontal presses, parts weigh about 1.2 kg with a gate to cut, there is a lot of oil mist, and the supply is 380 V / 50 Hz. The customer wants one operator to look after all six machines. From this the pre-sales engineer proposes a six-axis robot with a dedicated gripper (including a pneumatic gate cutter), a conveyor alongside, and an IP67 wrist.
Weeks 4–5 · Solution and quote. Pre-sales checks reach and cycle time in simulation: the robot cycle is about 18 s, well under the 30 s moulding cycle. The quote has three parts: robot and commissioning (us), gripper and conveyor (partner integrator), guarding and risk assessment (integrator). A RACI table is attached, and the cycle time is written as “subject to sample testing”.
Weeks 6–8 · Negotiation and contract. The customer finds the price high and compares a competitor. The salesperson doesn't cut the price but uses TCO and a quick ROI estimate: six machines on two shifts save about ten operators a year, for a payback of about 1.5 years; and a partner service provider in Vietnam guarantees spare parts within 48 hours. The deal closes with adjusted payment terms and the price essentially held.
Weeks 9–16 · Build, FAT and shipping. The integrator builds the grippers in China, the customer sends 200 sample parts, and the FAT at the factory runs four hours continuously: 99.8% pick success and acceptable gate cuts. Shipping is CIF Ho Chi Minh City in fumigated wooden crates.
Weeks 17–20 · Installation, SAT and service. On site, one press turns out to have a different safety-door signal interface; the integrator adds a converter module. Because the contract already said “press signal interfacing is the integrator's responsibility”, this never becomes a dispute. After SAT, the customer orders four more robots.
▶Watch
Key points
- Ask about the process before the model; demo-video cycle times never go straight into a contract.
- For welding and grinding, state who owns the process window.
- After the six questions, give a shortlisted type and at least three unknowns for pre-sales to verify.
Exercises
- Diagnose 2 imaginary projects with the six questions, one page each, ending with “suggested type + 3 unknowns to verify”.
- Use the dialogues in Chapter 09 as material.