Robot Sales Basics
中文
07

TCO, export terms and objection handling

Once the technical fit is there, winning depends on how clearly you explain risk and cost structure. Customers rarely compare robot unit prices; they compare the whole bill.

Total cost of ownership: the iceberg

Robot price Tooling · vision · safety guarding Integration · installation Training · documents · certification Spare parts · service · energy Downtime risk · changeover What you seeunit price Below thewaterline= TCO
Reading the diagram: in a robot project the robot is often only part of the total investment; tooling, integration, safety and service frequently make up more, and the split varies widely. Comparing unit prices alone misses the main costs.

A value story usually rests on: higher throughput, first pass yield (FPY), changeover time, labour productivity, consistent quality and safety compliance. When comparing competitors, look beyond specs (payload / reach / accuracy / IP / ecosystem) to the tooling library, vision partners, local service radius and spare-parts lead time. Overseas customers care a lot about time to recover from a breakdown.

Quick payback (ROI) estimate

The usual simplified formula: payback (years) = total investment ÷ (annual labour savings + other annual gains − added annual running costs). Use this calculator only for ballpark figures in early conversations; formal proposals follow the customer's finance rules.

Net gain per year—
Payback period—
Net gain over 5 years—

Currency follows your inputs (the example uses US dollars). Ignores discounting, tax and residual value.

Example: breaking down a quote

Below is an example quote structure for a machine-tending cell (illustrative figures). The robot itself is only about a third of the total; grippers, integration, guarding and services add up to more. When the customer compares your robot price with a competitor's, use this breakdown to bring the conversation back to the whole solution.

Example: what goes into a machine-tending cell quoteShare of total project price (illustrative)
Robot34%
Grippers, fixtures20%
Integration16%
Guarding10%
Vision8%
Training, docs7%
Spares (year 1)5%

Illustrative data; projects vary widely. In a simple palletising cell the robot's share is higher, in a complex welding line lower.

Some costs never appear on the quote but the customer still counts them: lost output from downtime, site work (foundations, air, power), internal engineering time, and capacity lost to changeovers. Raising these in your value story shows the customer you are helping them do the sums, not just selling equipment.

Diagnose before responding in negotiation

When a customer says “too expensive”, find out whether they are comparing the robot alone or a cell with tooling, integration and service. When they ask for turnkey delivery, clarify the acceptance outcome and site owners. Treat objections as missing information; that usually works better than arguing back.

Example dialogueCustomer: “Another quote is 15% lower. Can you match it?”
ClarifySales: “Let's align the scope. Does it include the gripper, guarding, installation, commissioning and SAT? When does the warranty start?”
RespondCustomer: “They quoted only the robot and controller.” Sales: “Let's compare the same scope first. If you only need the robot, we can quote the robot alone.”
ReviewNo competitor attack or immediate discount: align delivery scope and keep a reduced-scope option open.

After a negotiation, send a short recap: confirmed needs, data to verify, owners on both sides and the next date. This turns a conversation into a project that can move forward.

Export delivery essentials

A deal can go wrong on delivery terms even when the technical solution is right. Confirm the following before quoting and write them into the quote or a contract annex.

Power supply

Site power

China commonly uses 380 V / 50 Hz, Europe mostly 400 V / 50 Hz, North America 480 V or 208 V / 60 Hz, Japan 200 V. A mismatch means a transformer or a different cabinet specification.

Certification

Certificates and documents

CE, UL and similar requirements; manuals, wiring diagrams and declarations in English or the local language. Be clear who counts as the “manufacturer” of the integrated machine.

Incoterms® 2020

Trade terms

EXW, FCA, FOB, CIF, DAP and DDP decide freight, insurance, customs clearance and where risk passes. Always state the term and place, e.g. FOB Shanghai.

FAT / SAT

Two acceptance tests

The FAT (Factory Acceptance Test) takes place at the supplier's factory before shipping; the SAT (Site Acceptance Test) at the customer's site after installation. Agree criteria, location and costs for both in advance.

Service

Service and spare parts

Does the warranty start at shipment, arrival or SAT? Who provides overseas field service, and who pays travel? What spare-parts list and lead time do you recommend? Is remote diagnosis supported?

Logistics

Packing and shipping

Robot shipping pose and transport brackets, moisture-proof packing, ISPM 15 fumigated wooden crates, restrictions on shipping batteries.

Contracts and acceptance

Acceptance criteria must be measurable: cycle time, accuracy, continuous run (e.g. “8 hours without a fault”), yield. “Runs normally” is not an acceptance clause. Part redesigns and fixture changes go through a priced change order. Clear limits on training and warranty cut after-sales disputes.

Handling objections

Order of play: get the numbers first, then discuss type and safety, and finally set out the delivery scope. Click to expand the suggested replies.

“Can a cobot do this?”
Ask about cycle time and payload first, then safety.
Let's check cycle time and payload first—then we can confirm whether a cobot or an industrial arm fits, based on the risk assessment.
“It's too expensive.”
Move the discussion from unit price to TCO and downtime, then use the payback estimate for a ballpark.
Looking at total cost of ownership—tooling, integration, spare-parts lead time and downtime risk—often closes the gap versus unit price alone. Shall we walk through a quick payback estimate?
“Can you do turnkey?”
Show the scope and RACI: what you do and what your SI partner does.
We supply the robot and commissioning. For EOAT and line integration, we either work with a certified integrator partner or define a clear interface in the SOW (Statement of Work).
“Can you guarantee the cycle time?”
No empty promises; trade a commitment for a sample test.
We can commit to a target once a cycle-time test with your parts and EOAT has been done. Until then, it's an estimate subject to engineering review.
“Another supplier delivers faster.”
Break it down: robot lead time, integration time, time to stable production, and spare-parts lead time.
Could we compare time-to-production rather than just shipping date? That includes integration, SAT and spare-parts availability.

Key points

  • TCO covers the whole bill beyond the robot price; put spare-parts lead time and downtime risk on the table.
  • Write acceptance as measurable criteria; changes go through change orders.
  • On export projects always ask about power, certification, Incoterms and FAT/SAT.

Exercises

  • Role-play a discovery call in which the customer raises cobot, price and turnkey objections in a row.
  • Rewrite the replies above to match your company's real scope and have pre-sales annotate them.